Connect with us


AI and Medical Schools



Adding to the scholarly community’s man-made intelligence embrace, the College of Texas at San Antonio is offering a practitioner training matched with an expert’s in computerized reasoning.

Past the clamor of prescription school classes and mingling, Aaron Fanous invested his free energy looking into man-made reasoning and software engineering. Adjusting everything was an endeavor, yet notwithstanding medication, he’s constantly had an interest in innovation.

“I saw how influential software was in the medical world, and a lot of context was missing from it,” Fanous said. “The reality is, technology will come into medicine—it will be in most fields—and knowing what can be done with it will open so many doors to improve the entire system as a whole. That’s too big to ignore.”

Fanous is one of the primary understudies signed up for the College of Texas at San Antonio’s new double degree clinical program, which sent off the week before. It is among the principal in the country to join man-made reasoning with medication.

The program comes as numerous colleges are dumping cash into simulated intelligence, with some burning through millions on drives to outfit understudies with what many accept will be basic abilities for what’s in store.

Interest in simulated intelligence’s effect on medication has sloped up as of late, with analysts refering to likely advantages in treating, diagnosing and really focusing on patients.

“There has been a lot of conversation everywhere about AI and, in particular, the large language model,” said Dr. Alison Whelan, chief academic officer at the Association of American Medical Colleges.

AAMC casually overviewed its individuals this late spring, asking their contemplations on computer based intelligence’s convergence with the clinical world and how AAMC might help its individuals. ” With simulated intelligence, it was ‘Do what you generally do, yet perhaps speed up it since this is occurring quickly,'” Dr. Whelan said.

A few colleges the country over have started coordinating computer based intelligence into clinical practice. Clinical schools at the College of Florida, the College of Illinois, the College of Alabama at Birmingham and Stanford and Harvard Colleges generally offer varieties of a testament in man-made intelligence in medication that is to a great extent designed for existing experts.

“I think schools are looking at, ‘How do we integrate and teach the uses of AI?’” Dr. Whelan said. “And in general, when there is an innovation, you want to integrate it into the curriculum at the right pace.”

In the new double degree program at UT San Antonio, clinical understudies will burn through four years on the UT Wellbeing side and one year on the UT San Antonio side, eventually procuring a specialist of medication degree and an expert’s of science certificate in computerized reasoning. Understudies can pick a fixation in software engineering, information examination or independent frameworks.

“It’s more than just adapting to change; our program empowers physicians to lead the conversation on how AI can be used in health care,” said Dhireesha Kudithipudi, director of UTSA’s Matrix AI Consortium. “If physicians are not in the center of this conversation, then the solution may not really be harnessing the full potential of AI or won’t be holistic. So bringing them to the center and giving them the power to lead is what this program is trying to do.”

The program, about four years really taking shape, began coming to fruition well before last year’s blast of generative computer based intelligence like ChatGPT made the innovation a commonly recognized name. Kudithipudi is regulating the program from the UT San Antonio side, while Dr. Ronald Rodriguez, teacher of urology at UT San Antonio, is regulating the program from the UT Wellbeing side.

“We didn’t recognize how quickly the world would become interested in AI, but it came together nicely,” Dr. Rodriguez said. He said AI has been on his radar since 1980, when he took a computer course during his freshman year at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “I got really fascinated by it and thought it would be a great tool to have for scientific research and a variety of applications.”

Dr. Rodriguez desires to develop the UT program to about 15 understudies in the following couple of years.

“We said, ‘Let’s look at this as if we were starting from zero—how would we approach it?’ and realized we needed to start earlier, with medical students, not postgraduates,” he said. He added that he hopes the program will be a model, helping other universities overcome the challenges of combining two degrees from separate colleges.

Kudithipudi said the program can likewise assist the general exploration local area, building spans between the specialized and clinical sides that with having for some time been siloed. She said the program could extend inside also, highlighting interest from UTSA’s dental school.

“I think this is only the beginning; there’s a lot to explore here, and I truly believe the solutions we’re trying to build as engineers or computer scientists may not be holistic in a lot of cases,” Kudithipudi said. “We don’t want physicians to come in at the end point; we want them to lead or be engaged in the process very early.”

Continue Reading


As ChatGPT turns one, big tech is in charge




As ChatGPT turns one, big tech is in charge

The AI revolution has arrived a year after ChatGPT’s historic release, but any uncertainty about Big Tech’s dominance has been eliminated by the recent boardroom crisis at OpenAI, the company behind the super app.

In a sense, the covert introduction of ChatGPT on November 30 of last year was the geeks’ retaliation, the unsung engineers and researchers who have been working silently behind the scenes to develop generative AI.

With the release of ChatGPT, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman—a well-known figure in the tech community but little known outside of it—ensured that this underappreciated AI technology would receive the attention it merits.

With its rapid adoption, ChatGPT became the most popular app ever (until Meta’s Threads took over). Users were amazed at how quickly the app could generate poems, recipes, and other content from the internet.

Thanks to his risk-taking, Altman, a 38-year-old Stanford dropout, became a household name and became a sort of AI philosopher king, with tycoons and world leaders following his every word.

As for AI, “you’re in the business of making and selling things you can’t put your hands on,” according to Margaret O’Mara, a historian from the University of Washington and the author of “The Code,” a history of Silicon Valley.

“Having a figurehead of someone who can explain it, especially when it’s advanced technology, is really important,” she added.

The supporters of OpenAI are sure that if they are allowed unrestricted access to capital and freedom to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI) that is on par with or superior to human intellect, the world will be a better place.

However, the enormous expenses of that holy mission compelled an alliance with Microsoft, the second-biggest corporation in the world, whose primary objective is profit rather than altruism.

In order to help justify Microsoft’s $13 billion investment in OpenAI earlier this year, Altman steered the company toward profitability.

This ultimately led to the boardroom uprising this month among those who think the money-makers should be kept at bay, including the chief scientist of OpenAI.

When the battle broke out, Microsoft stood up for Altman, and the young employees of OpenAI supported him as well. They understood that the company’s future depended on the profits that kept the computers running, not on grand theories about how or why not to use AI.

Since ChatGPT launched a year ago, there has been conflict over whether AI will save the world or end it.

For instance, just months after signing a letter advocating for a halt to AI advancements, Elon Musk launched his own business, xAI, entering a crowded market.

In addition to investing in AI startups, Google, Meta, and Amazon have all incorporated AI promises into their corporate announcements.

Businesses across all industries are registering to test AI, whether it be through magic wands or killer robots, usually from OpenAI or through cloud providers like Microsoft, Google, or Amazon.

“The time from learning that generative AI was a thing to actually deciding to spend time building applications around it has been the shortest I’ve ever seen for any type of technology,” said Rowan Curran, an analyst at Forrester Research.

However, concerns are still widespread that bots could “hallucinate,” producing inaccurate, absurd, or offensive content, so business efforts are currently being kept to a minimum.

In the aftermath of the boardroom drama, tech behemoths like Microsoft, which may soon have a seat on the company’s board, will write the next chapter in AI history.

“We saw yet another Silicon Valley battle between the idealists and the capitalists, and the capitalists won,” said historian O’Mara.

The next chapter in AI will also not be written without Nvidia, the company that makes the graphics processing unit, or GPU—a potent chip that is essential to AI training.

Tech behemoth, startup, or researcher—you have to get your hands on those hard-to-find and pricey Taiwan-made chips.

Leading digital firms, such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, are leading the way.

Continue Reading


Amazon is launching Q, an AI business chatbot




Amazon is launching Q, an AI business chatbot

The announcement was made by Amazon in response to competitors who have introduced chatbots that have drawn attention from the public. It was made in Las Vegas during an annual conference the company organizes for its AWS cloud computing service.

San Francisco-based startup A year ago, OpenAI released ChatGPT, which ignited a wave of interest in generative AI tools among the general public and industry. These tools can produce textual content such as essays, marketing pitches, emails, and other passages that bear similarities to human writing.

Microsoft, the primary partner and financial supporter of OpenAI, benefited initially from this attention. It owns the rights to the underlying technology of ChatGPT and has utilized it to create its own generative AI tools, called Copilot.

However, it also encouraged rivals like Google to release their own iterations.

These chatbots represent a new wave of artificial intelligence (AI) that can converse, produce text on demand, and even create original images and videos based on their extensive library of digital books, online articles, and other media.

Q, according to Amazon, is capable of helping staff with tasks, streamlining daily communications, and synthesizing content.

It stated that in order to receive a more relevant and customized experience, businesses can also link Q to their own data and systems.

Although Amazon is seen as the leader in AI research, it is not as dominant as competitors Microsoft and Google when it comes to cloud computing.

According to the researchers, among other issues, less transparency may make it more difficult for users of the technology to determine whether they can depend on it safely.

In the meantime, the business has kept up its AI exploration.

In September, Anthropic, a San Francisco-based AI start-up founded by former OpenAI employees, announced that Amazon would invest up to $4 billion (£3.1 billion) in the business.

Along with new services, the tech giant has been releasing AI-generated summaries and an update for its well-liked assistant Alexa, which allows users to have more human-like conversations. of customer reviews for products.

Continue Reading


WatchGuard reveals 2024 cybersecurity threats forecasted




WatchGuard reveals 2024 cybersecurity threats forecasted

The world leader in unified cybersecurity, WatchGuard Technologies, recently released information about their predictions for cybersecurity in 2024. Researchers from WatchGuard’s Threat Lab predict that in 2024, a variety of new technologies and advancements will open the door for new cyberthreats. Large language models (LLMs), AI-based voice chatbots, and contemporary VR/MR headsets are a few possible areas of focus. Managed service providers (MSPs) play a big part in thwarting these threats.

“Every new technology trend opens up new attack vectors for cybercriminals,” Said WatchGuard Technologies’ Chief Security Officer, Corey Nachreiner. The persistent lack of cybersecurity skills will present the cybersecurity industry with difficult challenges in 2024. As a result, MSPs, unified security, and automated platforms are more crucial than ever for shielding businesses from ever-more-complex threats.

The Threat Lab team at WatchGuard has identified a number of possible threats for 2024. Large Language Models (LLMs) will be one major area of concern as attackers may use LLMs to obtain confidential information. With 3.4 million cybersecurity jobs available globally and a dearth of cybersecurity expertise, MSPs are expected to focus heavily on security services utilizing AI and ML-based automated platforms.

Artificial intelligence (AI) spear phishing tool sales on the dark web are predicted to soar in 2024. These AI-powered programs can carry out time-consuming operations like automatically gathering information, creating persuasive texts, and sending spam emails. Additionally, the team predicts a rise in voice phishing or “vishing” calls that use deepfake audio and LLMs to completely bypass human intervention.

The exploitation of virtual and mixed reality (VR/MR) headsets may pose a growing threat in 2024. Researchers from Threat Lab claim that hackers might be able to obtain sensor data from VR/MR headsets and replicate the user environment, leading to significant security breaches. The widespread use of QR code technology may not come without risks. The group predicts that in 2024, a significant cyberattack will occur when a worker scans a malicious QR code.

These professional observations from the WatchGuard Threat Lab team center on the convergence of artificial intelligence and technology. It is anticipated that in the future, entities of all sizes, will depend more heavily on managed and security service providers due to the rapid advancements in AI technology and the accompanying cybersecurity threats.

Continue Reading


error: Content is protected !!